[rdf4j-dev] RDF* and SPARQL* support in the Java API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[rdf4j-dev] RDF* and SPARQL* support in the Java API

From: Pavel Mihaylov <pavel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 22:57:50 +0200
Delivered-to: rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/rdf4j-dev>
List-help: <mailto:rdf4j-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev>, <mailto:rdf4j-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/rdf4j-dev>, <mailto:rdf4j-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi all,

There is https://github.com/eclipse/rdf4j/issues/1484 that describes some of the needs for supporting RDF* and SPARQL* in the future.

I thought a bit how to do this at the lowest level (Java API) and came up with this proposal: https://github.com/eclipse/rdf4j/pull/1868.

It started as a way to test what I had in my head but I ended up changing everything needed to compile and run the tests (see note on LocalRepositoryManagerTest though) so it’s more or less a solid foundation for further work on RDF* and SPARQL*.

Let me know what you think. In particular if you can think of any cases where the proposed changes to the data model won’t be enough to represent RDF*.

Regards,

Pavel

Prev by Date: Re: [rdf4j-dev] prepping M2 build
Next by Date: [rdf4j-dev] new Jenkins instance
Previous by thread: [rdf4j-dev] jenkins mail disabled for now
Next by thread: [rdf4j-dev] new Jenkins instance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs