[rdf4j-dev] SHACL compliance to W3C specs - worth doing a report?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[rdf4j-dev] SHACL compliance to W3C specs - worth doing a report?

From: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:38:26 +1100
Delivered-to: rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/rdf4j-dev>
List-help: <mailto:rdf4j-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev>, <mailto:rdf4j-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/rdf4j-dev>, <mailto:rdf4j-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I was wondering where we are with respect to the SHACL W3C compliance tests. Havard, do you think it's worth us generating a test report a la https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-test-suite/#validate-rdf-data-tests and perhaps submit an implementation report?

Cheers,

Jeen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rdf4j-dev] SHACL compliance to W3C specs - worth doing a report?
  - From: Håvard Ottestad

Prev by Date: Re: [rdf4j-dev] Jenkins
Next by Date: Re: [rdf4j-dev] Jenkins
Previous by thread: [rdf4j-dev] Jenkins
Next by thread: Re: [rdf4j-dev] SHACL compliance to W3C specs - worth doing a report?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top