I have a fix to the two classes that use it (Java 1.7's switch on string)
If you want me to check them in.
Or give them to you.
It's an isolated if else/if else that only changes the two methods that are failing under 1.6, but i was sorta waiting to ask Greg what he wants to do.
Yes my Mac is still at 1.6, and it just updated.
Greg has Mountain Lion, I'm still at Lion.
...Beth
Beth Tibbitts
Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform http://eclipse.org/ptp
IBM STG - High Performance Computing Tools
Mailing Address: IBM Corp., 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington, KY 40511
Jeffrey Overbey ---01/03/2013 02:48:08 PM---> Then it finds the java language 1.7-specific code (switch on a > string!) that was the reason it
![]()
| ![]()
Jeffrey Overbey <jeffreyoverbey@xxxxxxx> |
![]()
| ![]()
Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, |
![]()
| ![]()
01/03/2013 02:48 PM |
![]()
| ![]()
Re: [ptp-dev] Launching PTP runtime workspace (java runtime problem) |
![]()
| ![]()
ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Then it finds the java language 1.7-specific code (switch on a string!) that was the reason it must have flipped to 1.7... aha ....
I assume we still want minimal JVM to be ... 1.6?
I don't have a strong opinion, but I'd vote for sticking with 1.6. Both of my Macs have 1.6 JREs/JDKs and haven't auto-updated to 1.7, so I assume 1.6 is still standard on OS X... (?)
Jeff
P.S. Jay -- This is actually why I haven't committed the Blue Waters RM yet... I couldn't compile PTP and didn't have time to fix my environment yet..._______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
|