[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[ptp-dev] EPP Parallel package: Indigo SR1 RC1 EPP builds
|
RC1 for the EPP Parallel package is available at the link below.
Right now the CDT is still at the level at Indigo release.
I think we are waiting for CDT to transition their build over to the new git/hudson builds, and then we will incorporate these into the PTP build, and thus into the EPP parallel package.
...Beth
Beth Tibbitts
Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform http://eclipse.org/ptp
IBM STG - High Performance Computing Tools
Mailing Address: IBM Corp., 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington, KY 40511
----- Forwarded by Beth Tibbitts/Watson/IBM on 08/24/2011 04:07 PM -----
![]()
| ![]()
Markus Knauer <mknauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
| ![]()
EPP Developer Mailing List <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
| ![]()
08/19/2011 04:28 AM |
![]()
| ![]()
**[epp-dev] Indigo SR1 RC1 EPP builds |
![]()
| ![]()
epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi all,
as promised there is more than one release this week; the packages for our Indigo SR1 RC1 warm-up build are available from
http://build.eclipse.org/technology/epp/epp_build/indigo/download/20110818-2321/
It would be great if you could find some time to test the packages. Up to now there is not much change in them, i.e. I haven't seen many new versions in the packages and I didn't change the content (e.g. there were some thoughts to change the included SCM systems and to include EGit in more packages for the service release).
What do you think... should we put them on the download page as additional 'development build' or is it enough to declare the above build as "Indigo SR1 RC1" and leave them where they are? I would vote for leaving them on build.eclipse.org and put the Juno M1 build under the development tab of eclipse.org/downloads, but feel free to protest.
Thanks,
Markus_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
