[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [ptp-dev] install features
|
Fine by me, +1
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto
Greg Watson ---09/22/2010 10:14:20 PM---Can I get a +1, 0, or -1 from people? Thanks,
![]()
From: | ![]()
Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
To: | ![]()
Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
Date: | ![]()
09/22/2010 10:14 PM |
![]()
Subject: | ![]()
Re: [ptp-dev] install features |
![]()
Sent by: | ![]()
ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Can I get a +1, 0, or -1 from people?
Thanks,
Greg
On Sep 22, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
> I've been thinking about the features issue again and have come up with a different plan. Originally I was suggesting that we have three options: PTP, RDT, or PTP+RDT (plus some minor features). However on further reflection, I think this is overly complex also, since in most cases PTP users will also be RDT users.
>
> My second proposal is therefore that we have only two features: "PTP+RDT" and "RDT only". Although RDT has RSE dependencies, so installing PTP would implicitly install some RSE plugins, I don't think this is as much of a disadvantage as a confusing install process. Also, this is only what will be installed from the Helios/Indigo update site. Users are still able to choose to install any individual components from the PTP update site.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> ptp-dev mailing list
> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev

