Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [polarsys-iwg] polarsys-iwg Digest, Vol 65, Issue 5 
Hi Raphael,
excuse me, but also I really hope you are true I have seen that pattern to many times. 

Best regards

Carsten Pitz


Am 14.04.2017 um 18:00 schrieb polarsys-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx:

Send polarsys-iwg mailing list submissions to
	polarsys-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/polarsys-iwg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	polarsys-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
	polarsys-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of polarsys-iwg digest..."


Today's Topics:

    1. Re: on ReqCycle (FAUDOU raphael)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:35:16 +0200
From: FAUDOU raphael <raphael.faudou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Polarsys IWG <polarsys-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [polarsys-iwg] on ReqCycle
Message-ID:
	<1618DA04-253B-47DB-9DBD-C6F9CCCEF33C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8




Le 13 avr. 2017 ? 11:31, Carsten Pitz <carsten.pitz@xxxxxx> a ?crit :

Beside my feeling it is a shame to abandon such a fine piece of work, this also make me doubt the Polarsys toolchain will ever cover the whole V.

Did I say I abandon ReqCycle? No. I just shared with Polarsys community that it was hard to find efforts to improve ReqCycle and that I was looking for support to help building an import feature that is still missing (teamwork).

With Francis leaving Ericsson, also Titan silently vanished from the Polarsys portfolio. Titan was the only tool in the Polarsys portfolio that covered parts of the right side branch, the validation branch of the V.

And now ReqCycle ?

ReqCycle is still there and works.

ReqCycle is the only tool within the Polarsys portfolio I am aware of that offers requirements traceability. Requirements traceability is explicitly required by the DO178 and the IEC 61508 including its derivatives the CENELEC or the ISO 26262 just to name two of them.

Good to hear that. So, what about you? are you ready to support? can you help in a way or another (design, validation, coding?)?

If ReqCycle is abadoned, how to fulfill the DO178 or the IEC 61508 using the Polarsys toolchain?

Why would we abandon it? Be careful about wrong interpretations.
Please read carefully what I said and tell me what suggests to you that ReqCycle is abandoned.

Best regards
Rapha?l Faudou


Best regards,

Carsten Pitz

_______________________________________________
polarsys-iwg mailing list
polarsys-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/polarsys-iwg



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
polarsys-iwg mailing list
polarsys-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/polarsys-iwg

End of polarsys-iwg Digest, Vol 65, Issue 5
*******************************************

Back to the top