Hi Wayne,
Thanks for your interest in the Working Group. Actually, we are still ramping up, and I understand that it can be frustrating for users who are eager to test the projects. To address this, we plan a series of "getting started » documents that will help go through the tool chain. For the moment, I can point you to the Video section that contains a good video of Papyrus.
I can tell you that for the moment, our focus is: * to provide a 1.0 version of key projects like Papyrus and Sirius with a good level of usability, maturity and stability. * to bring new projects onboard like Arcon, Chess, Gendoc, Reqcycle, Kitalpha * to automate integration test between these projects
All contributions are welcome, and I think that describing your use case, your expectations or your requirements regarding to PolarSys would be a good contribution. Another type of contribution would be to test the latest Luna milestones (start here) of the projects that interest you.
Best regards, Folks:
The system you are creating is a very
welcome addition to the engineers toolbox. But, the learning curve
is extremely steep. What precious documentation that exists; is in
many cases out dated and incorrect. Additionally, there is no explanation
of many of the entities in the language that do not correspond to standard
SysML syntax (Nodes on Activity Diagrams for instance). Please explain
what does PolarSys intend to do to alleviate the pain of new users?
In His service,
Wayne
_______________________________________________ polarsys-iwg mailing list polarsys-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/polarsys-iwg
|