[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [platform-vcm-dev] Sync view reusable pieces will become internal
|
I will let you know about my experiences when I have finished my
implementation :)
But you are definitely right concerning those API change issues, I just had
to remind me that this Team API 2.0 stuff is still work in progress ...
- Boris
On Tue, 7 May 2002 Kevin_McGuire@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Cool!
>
> Still, I think the right answer is that we will leave it marked internal,
> then do an API review of it post 2.0. As a client of it we would really
> appreciate your feedback/participation at that time.
>
> This is in everyone's benefit. For example, if we declare it API now, then
> even if you had feedback and requests for improvement, we may not be able
> to act on them due to API compatibility rules.
>
> Cheers,
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
>
> Boris Pruessmann
> <boris+mailinglists.platform-vcm-dev@prue To: <platform-vcm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ssmann.org> cc:
> Sent by: Subject: Re: [platform-vcm-dev] Sync view reusable pieces
> platform-vcm-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx will become internal
>
>
> 05/07/2002 02:26 PM
> Please respond to platform-vcm-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
> You're right. I started to use them a while ago to provide a
> synchronisation view for my Perforce integration, similar to the cvs one.
>
> - Boris
>
> On Tue, 7 May 2002 Kevin_McGuire@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >
> > They will be in 2.0, its just that the API hasn't been ratified through
> > sufficient use and review. Marking it internal is just part of the
> > contract - we reserve the right to change them as we get feedback on
> usage.
> >
> > Actually, we didn't think anyone was using it. I take it you are?
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> > Boris Pruessmann
>
> > <boris+mailinglists.platform-vcm-dev@prue
> To: <platform-vcm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ssmann.org>
> cc:
> > Sent by:
> Subject: Re: [platform-vcm-dev] Sync view reusable pieces
> > platform-vcm-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> will become internal
> >
>
> >
>
> > 05/07/2002 02:39 AM
>
> > Please respond to platform-vcm-dev
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Will they stay there until R2.0?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 6 May 2002 James_Moody@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > The types in org.eclipse.team.ui.sync will be moved to
> > > org.eclipse.team.internal.ui.sync in the next Integration build. We
> have
> > > not yet decided on what shape, if any, the reusable sync view parts
> will
> > > take, and for this reason we have elected to make them non-API.
> > >
> > > Sorry for any inconvenience,
> > >
> > > james
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > platform-vcm-dev mailing list
> > > platform-vcm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vcm-dev
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > "Engineering does not require science. Science helps a lot but
> > people built perfectly good brick walls long before they knew why
> > cement works." - Alan Cox
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > platform-vcm-dev mailing list
> > platform-vcm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vcm-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > platform-vcm-dev mailing list
> > platform-vcm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vcm-dev
> >
> >
>
> --
> "Engineering does not require science. Science helps a lot but
> people built perfectly good brick walls long before they knew why
> cement works." - Alan Cox
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-vcm-dev mailing list
> platform-vcm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vcm-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> platform-vcm-dev mailing list
> platform-vcm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-vcm-dev
>
>
--
"Engineering does not require science. Science helps a lot but
people built perfectly good brick walls long before they knew why
cement works." - Alan Cox
