Re: [photran-dev] Beta 1 on Monday?

[Spiros Xanthos <xanthos2@xxxxxxxx>]

We added about.html files in all the plugins and licence.html in the 
photran-featrure.

>   <managedBuildRevision
>         fileVersion="3.0.0">
>      </managedBuildRevision>
We are not sure though about the effects of changing the fileVersion .
Craig is more familiar with this part of the code, is it going to cause 
any problems?

Also, should we distribute the intel-feature or exclude it form this 
release and let you (Intel) distribute it separately?

--Spiros

Hilliard, Bill wrote:

> I did some testing last night.  Everything seems to function o.k.  I
> have a few questions though.
>
> Eclipse legal requirements:
>
> There are still a lot of plugins that don't have about.html files
> associated with them and the Photran primary feature does not have the
> eclipse license.html file.  It was my understanding these are required
> by eclipse.org.  Just mentioning it.  I'm certainly no expert on the
> legal stuff.
>
> Managed build support:
>
> Both the Intel and the Photran managed build manifests have build
> definitions that specify:
>
>      <managedBuildRevision
>         fileVersion="3.0.0">
>      </managedBuildRevision>
>
> I think we should probably change these to "3.1.0" for the newer CDT
> version.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From: photran-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:photran-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Overbey
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 2:13 PM
> To: Photran Developer Info
> Subject: [photran-dev] Beta 1 on Monday?
>
> We are finishing up some things today; any objections to turning HEAD 
> into Photran 3.1 Beta 1 on Monday?
>
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> photran-dev mailing list
> photran-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/photran-dev
> _______________________________________________
> photran-dev mailing list
> photran-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/photran-dev
>
>