Hi Thierry,
Updating eclipse is relatively easy, so I hope you can update in 30mins.
Anyway, it depends on which api we will use. For example IAdatapter#getAdapter(Class):Object was updated in Mars to IAdapater#getAdapter(Class<T>):T. -- Dawid Pakuła +48 795 996 064
On 30 September 2015 at 22:14:44, thierry blind (thierryblind@xxxxxxx) wrote:
Hi Dawid,
totally agree with 1. and 3. :)
For 2., I'm still using Luna SR1 on some computers, with latest PDT
snapshots, so this means there will be no more backward
compatibility/support in the future?
I will be quite busy until beginning november, so sorry if I will
not be very available next months!
Thierry.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:25:16 +0200
From: zulus@xxxxxxxxx
To: pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pdt-dev] Target platform questions
Hi Team,
I have two problems for
today, both related to target platform.
1. Currently we checking our
builds with luna and mars repo. I have proposition to start build
with mars (base) and neon (next). Are you agree?
2. Independently from base
repository, we currently trying to keep api compatibility with
eclipse 3.8. Because I would like to start using Mars api (IAdapter
generics, parallel jobs, e4) I have a proposition to introduce
update api base line policy: Update api base line after each "*.1"
release. What you think?
3. Last problem is BREE
version, now set to 1.6. Mars targets it to 1.7 (EOL). I would like
to update also in PDT and introduce policy to keep min. java in
sync with platform. Again, what you think?
--
Dawid Pakuła
+48 795 996 064
_______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing
list pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve
your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
_______________________________________________
pdt-dev mailing list
pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
|