[pdt-dev] Moving to the latest org.h2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[pdt-dev] Moving to the latest org.h2?

From: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:00:22 -0600
Delivered-to: pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZSWm2sTcyEK8ngmIGdD8qzMEEWOCtnbTJFeM12eSOP71zIWb1MORgfS+oJy+8UVE+d vw49EMfNbFdUNXHG9z+POZldn72fEcvvwsN5yf7cZlyDwwndYIa6QYFKo7zJeksFgWTC B5Je8BTMJg9QrcWBYApDHczOBbojIZ1cL7A0A=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/pdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:pdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev>, <mailto:pdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/pdt-dev>, <mailto:pdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

It would be nice if you guys could move to a newer (preferably latest version)
of the h2 database [1]. In Fedora and RHEL land, we generally ship the latest
libraries and it's easier for us to deal with Eclipse when we don't have to
patch it to support the latest library.

From the looks of it... I see Version 1.3.149 (2011-01-07)

[1] - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=334464

-- 
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 860 839 2465

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pdt-dev] Moving to the latest org.h2?
  - From: Roy Ganor

Prev by Date: Re: [pdt-dev] pdt roadmap
Next by Date: Re: [pdt-dev] Moving to the latest org.h2?
Previous by thread: [pdt-dev] pdt roadmap
Next by thread: Re: [pdt-dev] Moving to the latest org.h2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs