[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pdt-dev] Re: resolving PDT build issues
- From: Michael Spector <spektom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:28:23 +0300
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kPJ3HAQjWfIA9nkD0Ra+u7FGm07N5NXs6uT1kItfZMg1mZsXzNKAQXgJ8bd8XKL6+u 2nc4PcPZwu2d2bUE/IWTNfge7clo8mv1bUIR4N5c2Bw/iDwUAwqk1/J2lKhTApL0v1Oj hjcfgEvbf8b9H+FPfJ0ewxhWhBegqHpj4STG8=
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Michael Spector <spektom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As I see we haven't got an approval for JFlex. Actually, this Jar is
> only used for generating PHP lexer sources. I can update the ANT task
> that generates lexers to fetch the JFlex Jar from the internet,
> generate files, and then remove it.
> Regarding JavaCUP we got an IP approval already.
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Nick Boldt <nickboldt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Do you know whether internal Jars are signed as well? We have JFlex &
>>> JavaCup jars that reside in org.eclipse.php.core plug-in...
>> I'm not sure if it recurses INTO jars; I would guess no.
>> BTW, I'm going to pretend that the aforementioned jars have already been
>> approved bby the Eclipse Legal team, documented in IPzilla with CQs, and not
>> mention that redistribution of non-CQ-approved code at eclipse.org is
>> illegal, since you already know that.
>> I'm going to further NOT mention that code released under GPL (or
>> GPL-equivalents) is not compatible w/ EPL and therefore cannot be approved
>> in IPzilla for redistribution.
>> Of course if you want to redistribute these jars you can do so @ sourceforge
>> or a similar place, but eclipse.org != GPL-land. That's how CDT gets around
>> this limitation for redistribution of MinGW.
>> Nick Boldt :: http://wiki.eclipse.org/User:Nickb
>> Release Engineer :: Eclipse Modeling & Dash Athena
> Best regards,