[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.0

Hi,

If it stalls the development beyond 0.7 i agree with Yossi and say drop the 0.7 release altogether and keep going. Between now and release of 1.0 anyone using in-between builds should be advised to use the latest integration build or wait until 1.0 release.

If it helps letting people update to that particular (most recent) integration build, maybe you should call it the latest rc for 0.7 or whatever, stating the ip issues as known issues. After all, what's in a name, right?

just my 2c

Yossi Leon wrote:

Hi Thomas and Dave,

Since the project is in incubation it’s possible to have IP issues as part of the build. Once I call it 0.7 it’s like ignoring Eclipse process and declaring the release by myself which I’m sure is not acceptable by Eclipse.org.

The latest integration from Feb 26 is the most stable and relevant version.

What do you suggest?

--
*Yossi Leon*

Product Manager, Development Tools

& PDT Project Leader
yossi@xxxxxxxx http://www.zend.com/ +1-212-645-0040

http://blogs.zend.com/author/yossi/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*From:* pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Thomas M. Ose
*Sent:* Thursday, March 29, 2007 12:49 PM
*To:* 'PDT Developers'
*Subject:* RE: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.0


Yossi,

I would have to agree with Dave that we need a base release to bring everyone to the same playing field, even if it is stable release of the last integration build and call it 0.7


/*/Thomas M. Ose/*/ Ose Micro Solutions, Inc.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*From:* pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Dave Kelsey
*Sent:* Thursday, March 29, 2007 6:14 AM
*To:* PDT Developers
*Subject:* Re: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.0



Yossi, I think you need to release a 0.7 version. Currently there are users on Rc2, others on various integration builds and I think it would be better to have a single version that all users download and report on until 1.0 is delivered. It will be confusing for both users and developers if there are multiple versions.


Regards

Dave Kelsey

*"Yossi Leon" <yossi@xxxxxxxx>*
Sent by: pdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

28/03/2007 23:01

Please respond to
PDT Developers <pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>



To



<pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

cc



Subject



[pdt-dev] PDT 1.0






Hi All,

I would like to share with you the thoughts regarding PDT 1.0 as you can see below.

If you find any reason not to skip 0.7 and to move forward with 1.0, please let us know.

Thanks,
--*
Yossi Leon*
Product Manager, Development Tools
& PDT Project Leader
yossi@xxxxxxxx http://www.zend.com/ +1-212-645-0040

http://blogs.zend.com/author/yossi/


------------------------------------------------------------------------


*From:* tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Yossi Leon*
Sent:* Monday, March 26, 2007 9:51 AM*
To:* Tools PMC mailing list*
Cc:* Sharon Corbett*
Subject:* [tools-pmc] PDT 1.0


Hi All,

PDT 0.7 was scheduled to be planned for the end February 2007. Due to IP issues that are now being investigated the release was postponed.
The roadmap is to have PDT 1.0 on September 2007 which contains mainly stability and few enhancements comparing to PDT 0.7.


I would like to propose not to wait for the IP approval and for the release of 0.7 and to move forward toward 1.0 (without any release of 0.7) and start providing builds for that version ASAP.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Thanks,
--*
Yossi Leon*
Product Manager, Development Tools
& PDT Project Leader
yossi@xxxxxxxx http://www.zend.com/ +1-212-645-0040

http://blogs.zend.com/author/yossi/



--*
Yossi Leon*
Product Manager, Development Tools
& PDT Project Leader
yossi@xxxxxxxx http://www.zend.com/ +1-212-645-0040

http://blogs.zend.com/author/yossi/
_______________________________________________
pdt-dev mailing list
pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev


------------------------------------------------------------------------

/Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/





------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
pdt-dev mailing list
pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev