Well, seeing that the bug guidelines explicitly suggest that the contributor who fixed the bug can verify it if (s)he was the originator, then perhaps I shall do that.
It’s a good chance to put the product build through its paces, anyways, before the release.
Christian
On 6 October, 2016 at 10:53:58, Peter Cigéhn (peter.cigehn@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
Hi,
I can answer what I did,
and that was to verify those Bugzillas that I was assigned as QA. I
only put the Bugzilla into verified state, but did not take the the
closed state, since I was not the reporter/originator of those
Bugzillas, and I felt that it was better to let the
reporter/originator to decide that it could be closed. This is how
I have interpreted our Bug
Guidelines.
/Peter Cigéhn
_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev
|
