Re: [paho-dev] Team call 16/04

["andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx" <andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think it probably needs to be as well, but I think we are still using Scott's dialin? So I am not certain if we can have it that long. I know the M2M IWG uses the Eclipse SIP but not sure about Paho.

On Monday, 15 April 2013, Benjamin Cabé wrote:

Thanks Andy!

I think the call should be one-hour long this time, no?

Benjamin-- 

De : "andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx" <andypiperuk@xxxxxxxxx>
Répondre à : General development discussions for paho project <paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date : lundi 15 avril 2013 19:52
À : General development discussions for paho project <paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : [paho-dev] Team call 16/04

Topics for tomorrow's call - a busy one since we've not spoken for a few weeks.

- update on OASIS process

- release plan and milestones per Ian's recent email. Specific inclusion/exclusion decisions.

- bugzilla triage

- Maven status

- status of CQs for Python and Objective-C contributions 

- next steps for additional client contributions

- additional protocols discussion post EclipseCon F2F meetup, CoAP etc

- tutorial and development documentation materials (on boarding new devs)

Will transfer this to the wiki later...

--
Andy Piper | Farnborough, Hampshire (UK)
blog: http://andypiper.co.uk   |   skype: andypiperuk
twitter: @andypiper  |  images: http://www.flickr.com/photos/andypiper

-- 
Andy Piper | Farnborough, Hampshire (UK)
blog: http://andypiper.co.uk   |   skype: andypiperuk
twitter: @andypiper  |  images: http://www.flickr.com/photos/andypiper