[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [paho-dev] Committer input requested: Eclipse participation in OASIS Standardization of MQTT Protocol
|
I am not a committer but I have worked in OASIS groups before, including helping set up the AMQP group. I would like to get involved with MQTT and my company will support the group in OASIS. I agree that OASIS has been involved in full-fat XML standards (ok I admit some part in that), but at the same time the OASIS process is all about what the contributors make of it.
Paul
On Jan 25, 2013 5:41 PM, "Scott de Deugd" <
dedeugd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Good points Andy.
Not surprisingly, we did receive a lot
of similar input along these when lines putting together the Charter
proposal. So far everyone involved wants to keep it lightweight and
to get to a level of standardization based on v3.1 without causing
disruption to existing implementations and deployments. To that end we
spent a lot of time defining/scoping backward compatibility in
the proposed Charter. I believe it is appropriate.
We did touch base with the AMQP OASIS
group and have included positioning between the two. Of course more
on that topic is always better, so perhaps there will be opportunities
soon for wastepapers or articles.
The Technical Committee will operate
under OASIS Non Assertion Terms.
...................Scott
From:
Andy Gelme <andyg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
01/24/2013 06:39 PM
Subject:
Re: [paho-dev]
Committer input requested: Eclipse participation in OASIS Standardization
of MQTT Protocol
Sent by:
paho-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
hi All,
On 2013-01-24 19:42 , paho-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
Please reply with your comments/suggestions and a
+1 if you would support
taking this request forward to Eclipse.
+1 from andyg
OASIS has been involved in some rather heavy-weight standards often involving
XML and large committees. Hopefully, MQTT can be kept focused and
fat-free.
Looks like AMQP is also under OASIS's umbrella ... so, we may need to clearly
distinguish the differences and situations where MQTT stands-out.
When it comes to patents and royalty-fees ... presumably we'd be aiming
for a royalty-free, Non-Assertion arrangement.
--
-O- cheers = /\ /\/ /) `/ =
--O
-- http://www.geekscape.org
--
OOO -- andyg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- http://twitter.com/geekscape
--
_______________________________________________
paho-dev mailing list
paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev
_______________________________________________
paho-dev mailing list
paho-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/paho-dev