[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [p2-dev] Talk'n Lock'n
|
Because of these types of issues we decided to disable the artifact locking by default (see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=341826). In M6 the locking was enabled by default.
Tom
Terry Parker ---04/29/2011 01:16:21 AM---I'm late to this thread, but I'm doing some work to setup a distribution based on 3.7m6, and I'm getting lock-related errors ev
![]()
From: | ![]()
Terry Parker <tparker@xxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
To: | ![]()
P2 developer discussions <p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
Date: | ![]()
04/29/2011 01:16 AM |
![]()
Subject: | ![]()
Re: [p2-dev] Talk'n Lock'n |
I'm late to this thread, but I'm doing some work to setup a distribution based on 3.7m6, and I'm getting lock-related errors everywhere when I point to repos with file-based URIs. Mainly I get errors like this:
java.io.IOException: The folder "/home/eclipse/repos/checkstyle/5.3.1/.artifactlock/.metadata" is read-only.
I'm not sure why that is, since I have write permission to that folder, but most of my users won't. The environment here is Linux.
I suspect that I should be setting my repositories as read only but I didn't find any documentation to do that (I only ever do headless p2 operations to create repositories).
Thanks,
Terry
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Oberlies, Tobias <tobias.oberlies@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Ian Bull wrote:
> 4. Don't use .lock files, but instead use the artifacts.jar as the lock
> file. This seems like the best solution and I've spent some time this
> weekend prototyping it. There are a few challenges with this approach that
> may be show stoppers (we allow users to change the 'shape' of the
> repository -- from .jar to .xml. This means that the .lock file will
> suddenly change; how do we deal with this? Also, what comes first, the
> repository or the lock?).
What is the use case of changing the shape? I can't imagine why you'd want to do that. Locking is a very useful feature, and if mutable shape is blocking a good solution, just drop that "feature".
Best regards
Tobias
_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev
_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev

