Re: [p2-dev] Misc Live 3 results, with custom optimization criteria

[Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the pointer Pascal.  I personally think the results are better than "not bad".  Speed is interesting but our usecases are more interested in correctness IMHO.  A quick scan of result show that we either tie or are not far off in the majority of cases. Well done to the competition team.

Jeff


On 2010-12-23, at 6:00 PM, Daniel Le Berre wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> The results of the third informal comparison of dependency resolver for
> Linux (MISC Live 3) have been disclosed a few days ago.
> 
> The results are here:
> http://www.mancoosi.org/misc-live/20101126/results/
> 
> The results of p2 during that event were not bad, considering that the
> other competitors are using plain C/C++ resolvers.
> (the lower the score, the better, ties broken using running time)
> 
> The nice feature of that third evaluation is that it contains user
> defined optimization functions:
> http://www.mancoosi.org/misc-live/20101126/criteria/
> 
> The version of p2 with custom opt function capability is available as
> part of p2cudf:
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/p2/CUDFResolver
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 	Daniel
> -- 
>             Daniel Le Berre mailto:leberre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>             MCF-HDR,  CRIL-CNRS UMR 8188,  Universite d'Artois
>             http://www.cril.univ-artois.fr/~leberre
> _______________________________________________
> p2-dev mailing list
> p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev