[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [p2-dev] Issue running p2 director
|
I also think the category is a good abstraction. If the category is created with the idea of possibly installing whatever may be under it what is wrong with that? However if there is a better way to do this then I would use that.
Daniel Jacobowitz ---09/14/2009 11:52:53 AM---On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:07:47AM -0400, Pascal Rapicault wrote: >
![]()
From: | ![]()
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@xxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
To: | ![]()
P2 developer discussions <p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
Date: | ![]()
09/14/2009 11:52 AM |
![]()
Subject: | ![]()
Re: [p2-dev] Issue running p2 director |
![]()
Sent by: | ![]()
p2-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:07:47AM -0400, Pascal Rapicault wrote:
>
> The short answer is no. There is no mechanism to install all the elements
> found in a category and there is no problem with the EMF repo.
I've found that installing a category IU using the director does
pretty much what you'd expect. But it looks to me like it's a bug
rather than a feature that this works; when you click on a category in
the UI, the category's IU is not installed, only its children. When
you install a category using the director, the category IU is
installed.
IMO it would be helpful if the director let you install a category,
in the same way as the UI. Whether that means both install the
category IU or neither does, I don't know.
It may not be helpful with the categories presented by the eclipse.org
update sites, but it's helpful with the categories we present in our
product.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev

