[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [p2-dev] Publisher vs. generator/director
You should transition to the publisher (it will be the tool moving forward, and we could use the help with bug reports, etc...). I like the question "Are there docs I'm missing"? I think the question should be "Are the docs missing" and the answer is yes. Docs are now on my todo list. :)
You should be able to run the features and bundle publisher and point to a director (-source) containing /features and /plugins. When you use the director to install you use -installIU (not -root). I don't think we create a single IU that holds all the IUs.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
In 3.4.x, we in Fedora used the EclipseGenerator app to generate
metadata and then used the director app to install it.
In 3.5, should we use FeaturesAndBundlesPublisher?
I tried using the publisher with the director it and although it
generates metadata seemingly fine, the director fails when given the
same "-root". What am I doing wrong? Is there a publisher equivalent
to the director app? Are there docs I'm missing?
p2-dev mailing list
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484http://eclipsesource.com