[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [p2-dev] version tags in 3.4 maintenance branch
I don't think this discussion resulted into a must do or that there was any real consensus as long as the teams were careful and consistent. Obviously we have not been consistent because I used the typical tag.
In the past(3.3), equinox has been using using RXX so I would propose that we stick with that for now, even though I don't like the approach of stating this kind of information in the version.
Susan Franklin McCourt ---07/23/2008 12:23:39 PM---Hi, everyone... I was getting ready to tag a UI change in the maintenance branch and I
Susan Franklin McCourt <susan_franklin@xxxxxxxxxx>
07/23/2008 12:23 PM
[p2-dev] version tags in 3.4 maintenance branch
I was getting ready to tag a UI change in the maintenance branch and I noticed two different styles of tags for p2 changes in the maintenance branch:
When we last had a tag discussion in eclipse-dev, Boris proposed the optional maintenance branch after the date/time, and John suggested putting it before, and in general it was pretty late in the 3.4 cycle to change the standards.
But now it seems we should at least standardize within p2 on what to do?
p2-dev mailing list