[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [ormf-dev] Time to tackle BA&D
|
B. and I were working on a project last month where one of the team
was picking up Buckminster from ground zero and he was tasked with
putting together an integrated automated BA&D for the companies
product lines. He was your average Java developer with Eclipse
experience. He took two weeks (10 days) to get up and running and
having built his initial scripts. There was still refinement and
expansion to be tackled but he had a basic running system. This should
help scope what is required.
I do not think that we need a fully working system next week -) If it
was possible to accomplish an initial framework within the scope of
Iteration 1, then I think we would be doing well.
At this point I think that it is likely to be you Achim or nobody at
this juncture. On the other hand for now I see this as a nice to have
not a necessity, so don't anguish if you do not think that you can
commit to it.
Also, the offer of your running the tests if very welcome. Many thanks.
Cheers,
Joel
On 27 Sep 2008, at 15:54, Achim Lörke wrote:
Sorry, no experience with Buckminster on my site. We (we as in
Bredex) are in the process of changing our builds from homegrown ant
scripts to PDE build. I'll probably look into Buckminster too but
I'm not sure if it's enough of a benefit to justify the cost (from
our point of view).
If we decide to do testing with GUIdancer (which seens likely) I'll
do nightly builds and testing (probably using our environment for
running the tests). We can talk about me doing all of configuration
management instead of only part of it.
Achim
