Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [ormf-dev] Setting out task

Bugzilla is typically where individual tasks are managed, with the usual practice of CCs and dependency links used to keep everyone informed of task state changes.  There is typically a default *-inbox alias provided for components in Bugzilla as the default assignee, which allows everyone on the team to watch all new bugs arriving so that they can CC themselves to ones of interest.

So while it's not as ideal as everyone sitting in the same office and having daily interaction, it does work fairly well in distributed teams.  It's just a matter of getting used to it and sticking to an agreed upon process.  Mailing lists work well for certain things, but as mentioned already, Bugzilla is where the majority of development tasks and discussions traditionally take place on Eclipse projects.  This doesn't mean you have to do it this way, of course.  There is typically a balance of mailing list, bugzilla, wiki, and conference call activity on projects.  Perhaps Mylyn would be helpful to use on ORMF to assist with Bugzilla and task management?

HTH,
Rich


-----Original Message-----
From: ormf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ormf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joel Rosi-Schwartz
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 7:26 AM
To: The Open Requirements Management Framework project development list
Subject: Re: [ormf-dev] Setting out task

You bring up an interesting subject that does need to be clarified.  
What is the purpose of the ormf-dev mail list? It appears from perusing other dev lists of Eclipse projectw, that the list usage is typically of a bureaucratic nature, f.i. votes, releases, etc.. So if we follow this pattern, which is what I gather Achim is inferring, then where do we have team communications? In my opinion lack of communication is a major issue with the ORMF team, so simply delegating task in Bugzilla is going to do little towards team building. Surely we should start having regular (weekly?) team conference calls, but is that sufficient? Personally I do not think so.

I would very much appreciate advice from our mentors on these points.

Thanks,
Joel



On 3 Sep 2008, at 08:01, Achim Loerke wrote:

> Just a short reply: we are currently switching our operating 
> environment from Windows Server 2003 32bit to Windows Server 2008 
> 64bit. It all works reasonably well but takes up most of my time. I 
> will start working on the CQs in the next few days.
>
> I think it's best not to use ormf-dev for discussions regarding the 
> individual tasks if the topic is not of general interest. So if there 
> are no different opinions I'll limit emails to ormf-dev regarding my 
> tasks to status reports and the occasional cry for help.
>
> Achim
>
> --
> BREDEX GmbH
> Mauernstr. 33
> 38100 Braunschweig
>
> Tel.: +49-531-24330-0
> Fax:  +49-531-24330-99
> http: www.bredex.de
>
> Geschäftsführer: Hans-J. Brede, Achim Lörke, Ulrich Obst Amtsgericht 
> Braunschweig HRB 2450 
> <Achim_Loerke.vcf>_______________________________________________
> ormf-dev mailing list
> ormf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ormf-dev

_______________________________________________
ormf-dev mailing list
ormf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ormf-dev




Back to the top