Re: [ormf-dev] Re: Naming conventions for exemplary tool

Re: [ormf-dev] Re: Naming conventions for exemplary tool

From: "Ben Garbers" <bengarbers@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 21:13:19 -0500
Delivered-to: ormf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=rEqaP5Zz+dRHWtZIdHDVnoPm0hx0HdeeUjS9Y39jNqq1gIm732Dl6ZwvIWVoacsTeY 6f9jYb2P5LnUxDVXHV28VNwbtG2zv8ErlTVkAAeVtpsleNMFAYlFawHWAE0Z3LN3jtjk GzrRECF8pE6W19YLSbFvgnSQ2ZnkLwQuZY0J0=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ormf-dev>
List-help: <mailto:ormf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ormf-dev>, <mailto:ormf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ormf-dev>, <mailto:ormf-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I agree with Rich. org.eclipse.ormf.xxxx would be my vote.

References:
- [ormf-dev] Naming conventions for exemplary tool
  - From: Barbara Rosi-Schwartz
- [ormf-dev] Re: Naming conventions for exemplary tool
  - From: Richard Gronback