Re: [orbit-dev] Ant bundle naming

[Jeff McAffer <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Good catch but I would not worry about
history in this particular case.

Jeff

DJ Houghton/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/04/2007 03:03 PM

Please respond to
Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [orbit-dev] Ant bundle naming

Since we got all +1s for this and also no objections
during the last Orbit
call, I will proceed to rename this bundle.

I was planning on doing this on the command-line by just renaming the
folder on the server, but then I was wondering about the builds. In the
Platform we keep old bundles and tags around so our old builds are
re-producable.

Is this the case with Orbit as well or can we just remove the old bundle?

Thoughts?


orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 03/30/2007 10:13:42 AM:

>
> In the Eclipse Platform we have shipped the Ant bundle (named
> org.apache.ant) for years.  When the bundle was released to Orbit
we
> changed it to be called org.apache.tools.ant to conform to the Orbit
> standard of using the dominate package name as the bundle name.  The
plan
> was to then (in the Platform) create an org.apache.ant bundle which
> required and re-exported the new org.apache.tools.ant bundle.
>
> Although this works well in most Eclipse use-cases, we are finding
that a
> lot of people have scripts which reference the specific Ant jars.
This
> includes people who are contributing Ant tasks as part of their bundle,
> etc. We can't break everyone and ask them all to change their scripts.
>
> We are proposing the following:
> - grandfather the org.apache.ant name into Orbit
> - rename the org.apache.tools.ant bundle in Orbit to org.apache.ant
> - let the Platform consume the org.apache.ant bundle from Orbit
>
> Are there any comments/objections?
>
>

_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev