[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [open-regulatory-compliance] CRA: Online survey for Free Software Stewards, for Free Software projects and for manufacturers
|
I agree with all of Daniel's critique of these surveys and have a
few more:
Requiring Yes or No answers (without opportunity to answer) is
poor design.
Most of the questions on the Free Software Projects questionnaire
seem to be based upon the premise that Free Software Project
maintainers (or leads or current team members) and 'stewards' as
defined by CRA (in the future) are different groups of people.
Why would that be the case? That's a very poor assumption when
talking about infrastructure/library (most existing/depended
upon/actual) open source projects.
e.g. https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1025971/73f269ad3695186d/
...and many, many, (most) others.
On 7/13/2025 9:00 AM, Daniel
Thompson-Yvetot via open-regulatory-compliance wrote:
I have a similar perspective as Lars - some
questions for manufacturers just cannot be answered yet.
Additionally for open source, you have a situation where you
conflate the natural personhood of the responder with the
notion of “becoming a steward, which is something only a legal
person can do.
Perhaps this is due to the translations?
Further, I think it would be important for me
(or any other respondent) to know:
- who the “we” is in the context of the survey
(FSF Europe acting alone…?)
- what the “dialogue for cybersecurity” is all
about (in English)
- finally, your hope to “make
sure the CRA implementation does not harm the open source
ecosystem” seems like an impossible task and not something
you should claim - but again, I am guess this is a language
/ translation issue…
And last but not least, I found it kind of hard
to navigate between the three questionnaires…
_______________________________________________
open-regulatory-compliance mailing list
open-regulatory-compliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://accounts.eclipse.org