I'm sorry too. I'm getting a bit touchy because I see no progress.
Everybody is asking questions but this group is supposed to prepare the
answers - "to guide and support compliance". At least that's what I read
on the website. We will not get any answers about compliance by asking
the same questions over and over again.
Dirk-Willem gave answers by proposing a FAQ text and I gave answers by
proposing a different text (which, understandably, nobody liked).
Everybody else is just asking variants of the same question. But all of
us need to work on answers!
I think many people understand this, but watching the back and forth, I feel the need to say this "out loud":
Many parts of the legislation are very unclear, especially around open source and commercial intersections, and further, there are new definitions of who plays what role when (manufacturer vs steward). This isn't new information, and, as was discussed a lot during the drafting phases, somewhat misinformed and somewhat intentional... trying to close loopholes that, IMO, didn't need to be closed.
As a result, it's likely impossible to give the definitive answers that engineering types want until lawsuits and subsequent case law define things more clearly. In other words, we can look at the words of things and "know" that they are illogical and substitute our sensible judgment on what they're supposed to mean, but until cases are filed and settled, they will remain murky.
That murkiness will ultimately harm the community, as we've seen with some of these contributors "opting out." Very little can be done in the interim to clarify these ambiguities.
Now, what we can be more precise about is if you assume the worst case and you are a manufacturer, how can you be compliant? What standards are used to measure? These things are tractable, IMO, and can be a short-circuit evaluation. E.g., Even if you can't figure out if you are "out of scope" or a steward or a manufacturer if you assume the worst, do these things, you're covered, and then it doesn't matter what role you are in. We should be able to do this part of the work.