Re: [nebula-dev] NatTable 0.9.0 Release

[Edwin Park <esp@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hmm. Yes, it seems like what folks use the Closed state for is open to interpretation. We used it as part of our release review process. We could have used Verified as well I suppose.

I'll copy you on communication with the webmaster around the webstart issue.

By the way, are you able to see the nattable.core hudson job configuration? (https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/nattable.core/configure) We gave you full access to our build. Would you be willing to give Dirk and myself access to the nebula builds so we can emulate your configuration for publishing?

Thanks,

Edwin

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Well, after reading the bug again, this is still not clear. So you can just ignore my previous advise and make up your own mind after reading the bug.

Regards,

Wim

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I see. Let me know if I can help. 

I have noticed another thing from your impressive changelog [1]:

The bugs are all set to "Closed". Since a few months [2] I know that the status closed is used when nothing has been changed. 

so the status change should be: resolved-fixed and after that: resolved-verified.

 

Regards,

Wim

[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?product=NatTable&target_milestone=0.9.0&order=Last%20Changed&list_id=3014734

[2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=380833

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Edwin Park <esp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Wim,

The webstart issue seems to be linked to Java 7. Looking around online a bit indicates that webstart in Java 7 requires jnlp files to be served via HTTPS. I'll have to work this out with the Eclipse webmaster. In the meantime I have modified the webstart files to force the demo to run with Java 6 only.

You are right, there is no update site for this release. This is partly because we were unable to figure out how to publish one from the hudson build (we still cannot see the nebula configuration), and also several of our extension projects require 3rd party dependencies that are not in Orbit at the moment. These are short-term issues and I'm sure they will get resolved, but we didn't want to hold up the release for this. I fully expect our next release to have a p2 update site with signed jars, etc.

Cheers,

Edwin

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I don't see the NatTable update site location from the download site.

Regards,

Wim

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Edwin Park <esp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

NatTable 0.9.0 has been released! An announcement has been posted to the forum and the web site has been updated to reflect the release.

Thanks all!

Edwin

_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev

_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev

_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev

_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev