Hi David, I appreciate your reccomendations.
I agree with you that we are not going to save time. But as we already have our servers (not a datacenter, but a home-based datacenter) we thought that beybe we could take advantage of them using them only for a few months (a year max) decreasing costs as we already have this proliants. At the same time we could use this period to analyse
growth patterns, users preferences... maybe we are wrong, of course. This is something that we have not completely clear.
Think that we also has to spend money during this phase to put the project in the market: marketing, launch campaign... and to create our company (it is expensive in Spain). But we know that this should not be a long term solution (sure you are right, we know this).
Also, we really do not think that a simple t1.micro is enough. Our current deployment is composed by 8 VM; none of them the kind of instance that a t1.micro is, but higher (we did some proofs before configuring them as they are configured). So we think we need t2.medium and m3.large instances (some of both) only to to start. At current AWS pricing this is about 600-700$/month. So... it is nor a great neither a small invest. We are doubting at this point. We will do a deeper analysis on this.
Thanks.
PS: 50 msg/hour is not the total number, but 50msg/hour per client, so it is the aggregated traffic what matters. And we do not know how it is going to grow and the number of concurrent connections we will have. Somethim more to think :-)
PS2: I'll contact you, of course.