| Re: [modeling-pmc] Reminder to vote on the Project Lead Election for Ed Willink on Eclipse UML2 |
Hi Wayne
Thanks.
Hard to sort out the PL at exactly the same time, since the 'new' team may deserve a moment or two to consider PL candidates.
However, when resolving dysfunctionality, the EMO could terminate committers that fail to participate in dysfunctionality discussions so that the project is not advanced to a differently dysfunctional state. The 'new' team can always re-elect over enthusiastically terminated committers.
Or the non participating committers could just be partially disenfranchised for a year so that they did not count towards the election quorum.
Regards
Ed
Normally, declaring a project dysfunctional gives us a single opportunity to correct things. But...we clearly missed some things, so I'll take the PMC's request as approval to adjust the project further.
For reference, we declared the project dysfunctional here: https://www.eclipse.org/lists/modeling-pmc/msg05288.html
Mental note for next time: let's deal with the project leads while we're at it.
I've appointed Ed Willink as a project lead. Thanks for stepping up, Ed.
The project will remain dysfunctional as long as only two of four committers vote in elections. I recommend you consider using your awesome new powers to retire the unresponsive project lead and committers (AFAICT, we haven't heard from Kenn in two years, and it's been at least five years since we last heard from Christian). Standard practice is to announce your plans on the project dev-list; there's more discussion here.
Thanks for continuing to push on this.
Wayne
On Sat, 4 Apr 2026 at 03:46, Ed Merks via modeling-pmc <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please help this process move forward in whatever way is deemed to be
most appropriate. Deeming the election to be successful would seem
non-controversial...
On 4/4/2026 7:02 AM, Edward Willink via modeling-pmc wrote:
> Hi
>
> Eclipse UML2 was declared dysfunctional in order to appoint the two
> committers who voted. Is this dysfunctionality sufficient to allow the
> EMO to address the PL election impasse, or is a further declaration of
> dynsfunctionality required to terminate the two committers who failed
> to vote and so blocked the election?
>
> Regards
>
> Edward Willink
>
> On 19/03/2026 04:10, Eclipse Foundation via modeling-pmc wrote:
>> Voting will close on 2026-03-23 for the Project Lead election of Ed
>> Willink
>> on project Eclipse UML2 (modeling.uml2).
>>
>> Criteria:
>>
>> Ed Willink has made an impact on the project.
>>
>> He put in a great effort to revive the project and take care of a
>> long time
>> inactive Project.
>>
>> It is my pleasure to nominate Ed Willink as a project lead on Eclipse
>> UML2.
>>
>> Eclipse UML2 project committers can click the election link below to
>> vote.
>>
>> Election:
>> https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.uml2/elections/election-ed-willink-eclipse-uml2
>>
>>
>> Project: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.uml2
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> modeling-pmc mailing list
>> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton (he/him)
Head of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation
_______________________________________________ modeling-pmc mailing list modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc