| Re: [modeling-pmc] Committer Election for Peter Kirschner on Eclipse Fennec has started |
Hi Ed,
I understand where you are coming from, and I was a bit unsure myself as I wrote the recommendation. It may have been a bit hasty.
A bit of background, so we might find a solution:
We are still in the initial setup phase for the Project. We moved the first Project and, due to too much workload, stagnated after that. The only thing that is missing right now, is the final polishing on the build and deployment process via GitHub actions. This is usually a trial and error process with commit and pray.
Peter will take care of this. He furthermore will do more work on the different projects in the future, and we consider him Part of the initial Team for the Project. As we made the proposal, Peter was not really on our radar, despite us knowing him for quite some time.
Long Story short: He might be able to do what he intends to do in a PR, but testing different scenarios like SNAPSHOT releases to sonartype on the snapshot branch and maven central releases on the main branch are easier to achieve and test if he gets committer status. So we thought, we could take the easy route via a committer election. I guess I should have written all this in the recommendation, now that I think about it.
I suggest sending all this as an amendment to the Mailing list for clarification, or do you have different ideas?
Thanks,
Jürgen.
Am 26/02/2025 um 18:40 schrieb Ed Merks:
Jürgen,
I hate being a stickler for details, but even if I were to approve this vote, the EMO would reject it.
During initial project creation you could specify any set of initial committers. But now you must justify adding a committer to a project based on demonstrated contributions to the project, e.g., accepted pull requests. It's really not a high bar, everyone should understand how to create a pull request, and it's easy for any committer to approve one. Once you have that, we can proceed.
Sorry,
Ed
On 26.02.2025 13:33, Eclipse Foundation via modeling-pmc wrote:
A Committer election for Peter Kirschner on project Eclipse Fennec
(modeling.fennec) was started by Jürgen Albert with this criteria:
Peter Kirschner is a long standing and active member of the OpenSource
community.
He will take an active role in maintaining Eclipse Fennec and help the
various Projects to start flying.
It is my pleasure to nominate Peter Kirschner as a committer on Eclipse
Fennec.
Eclipse Fennec project committers can click the election link below to vote.
Election: Election for Peter Kirschner as Committer on Eclipse Fennec [1]
Project: Eclipse Fennec [2]
[1]
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.fennec/elections/election-peter-kirschner-eclipse-fennec
[2] https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.fennec
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
-- Jürgen Albert CEO Chair Eclipse OSGi Working Group Steering Committee Data In Motion Consulting GmbH Kahlaische Str. 4 07745 Jena Mobil: +49 157-72521634 E-Mail: j.albert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Web: www.datainmotion.de XING: https://www.xing.com/profile/Juergen_Albert5 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/juergen-albert-6a1796/ Rechtliches Jena HBR 513025