[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] ATL project co-leadership
|
Ed,
Yes, there is no formal portal mechanism for electing the leader, so a
"vote" on the dev mailing list has to suffice. Any committer can
nominate any committer and the rest of the committers should voice their
opinion in the form of +1, 0, -1. It's a good opportunity to warn
inactive committers that failure to participate in even the most basic
way (expressing an opinion in an election) may result in their committer
rights being suspend/revoked.
Regards,
Ed
Regards,
Ed
On 22/05/2012 10:43 PM, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi
The ATL project currently has two active committers but no active leader.
ATL needs an active leader to manage the Juno release activities.
The active committers seem happy for one of them to be the co-lead
while the position of the existing leader is clarified.
The Portal seems to allow for Committer elections, but not Project
Leader elections. How do we organize this (Bjorn's blog posts that
clarify this seem to have been archived.).
Is it sufficient for one active committer to propose the other as
co-lead on mmt-dev and hope that one of the inactive committers +1's
to get a quorum?
Do we need a formal election so that non-voters can be decommitterized
prior to a re-run?
Regards
Ed Willink
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc