Re: [modeling-pmc] Epsilon's graduation from incubation

[Dimitris Kolovos <dskolovos@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Modelling PMC,

As briefly discussed with Kenn and Ed, EMF is probably not the natural place for Epsilon to move to, and splitting Epsilon across MMT/M2T (Epsilon contains both M2M, M2T and other languages for tasks such as validation, pattern matching, migration, refactoring etc.) does not sound great either.

A sensible way forward could be for Epsilon to graduate as a sub-project directly under Eclipse Modelling. Would the PMC be OK with this?

Best regards,
Dimitris

On 13 Apr 2012, at 23:32, Kenn Hussey wrote:

> Dimitris,
> 
> Thanks, the slides look good. I guess this mean moving Epsilon to the "emf" (as opposed to the "emft") namespace?
> 
> +1 from me for the graduation.
> 
> Kenn
> 
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Dimitris Kolovos <dskolovos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Modelling PMC,
> 
> After almost 6 years in incubation, we feel that time has come for Epsilon to graduate, and in order to schedule a combined graduation/release (1.0) review, the PMC's approval is needed. In preparation for this, we've put together a draft deck of slides according to [1]. Any feedback would be much appreciated.
> 
> Best regards,
> Dimitris
> 
> [1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Criteria_for_Graduating_from_Incubation_Phase_to_Mature_Phase
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> modeling-pmc mailing list
> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc