Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] [cross-project-issues-dev] Notifcation to let QVTO contribute to Juno

Pierre,

The train's schedule is not likely to change and it's something I think is a key aspect to Eclipse's overall success. How much change ends up on the train each year is another issue. In theory one should be able feed older content into the train, at least if all the frameworks on which you rely remain binary compatible from release to release. That is certainly something EMF aims for each time, but things like UML and OCL seem to evolve more rapidly and not necessarily as cleanly, and that affects their downstream clients. And of course it's certainly reasonable to feed nothing into the maintenance releases if there's no time and no high demand for fixes.

Builds themselves remain a huge expensive and complex overhead, but supporting timely fixes for industrial users is also a key to inspiring confidence. There just needs to be consistent, long term, reliable funding for producing builds and for responding to changes in base frameworks. There's no avoiding that and there's nothing unlikely to be any possibility of telling the train to slow down...

Regards,
Ed


On 02/01/2012 10:57 AM, GAUFILLET, Pierre wrote:
Hi everybody!

This is one of the reasons why Polarsys&  LTS IWG are being set up: taking care of / helping to organize the maintenance aspect (even if innovation is not forgotten) of Open Source Components.
As said in the conversation, it is especially true for stable frameworks like EMF, on which most if not all Eclipse modelling features are based, but which does not always bring direct value to industrial users.

Maybe also that releasing trains once (and three times with the Service Releases) a year is too frequent given the available means.

---
Pierre

-----Message d'origine-----
De : modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Ed Merks
Envoyé : dimanche 18 décembre 2011 10:08
À : PMC members mailing list
Objet : Re: [modeling-pmc] [cross-project-issues-dev] Notifcation to let QVTO contribute to Juno

Ed,

Yes, one of the fundamental problems is that people will pay for new
things, and individuals will fall all over themselves to be new
committers on projects, but people often don't want to pay to maintain
old things and often don't spend so much effort supporting old things.
We're a shiny-and-new-oriented culture that looks to fashionable change
for keeping it all exciting and new.  Better that old things be
forgotten or maybe we can recycle them to ease our conscience...


The information in this e-mail is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Airbus immediately and delete this e-mail.
Airbus cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this e-mail as it has been sent over public networks. If you have any concerns over the content of this message or its Accuracy or Integrity, please contact Airbus immediately.
All outgoing e-mails from Airbus are checked using regularly updated virus scanning software but you should take whatever measures you deem to be appropriate to ensure that this message and any attachments are virus free.

_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc


Back to the top