[modeling-pmc] Re: [emf-dev] Transition Plan for MDT OCL and EMF "QTV" C

[Cédric Brun <cedric.brun@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

as M2T/Acceleo extensively uses MDT OCL no doubt Obeo will step up and
provide a commiter.  Laurent Goubet provided a few bug reports, sometime
with patches, and would probably be a good candidate as he is also an
M2T/Acceleo commiter and as a matter of fact, Acceleo needs a nice MDT
OCL component to perform perfectly :)

Cédric

Anthony Hunter a écrit :
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> Since IBM originally committed these components and since IBM
> definitely requires these components in our Eclipse based modeling
> stack, we will not let them go to termination review. The Eclipse
> modeling package also requires these. GMF requires these components. I
> can go on...
>
> I will find out which of our older IBM committers for these components
> would be able to take back their commit rights that have expired.
>
> At worst I will make sure these get through the Galileo release. We
> are in the home stretch and cannot let the release fall apart.
>
> Anyone else want to help me with these components for Galileo?
>
> Cheers...
> Anthony
> --
> Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
> Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
> IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GEF / GMF / Modeling Tools
> Phone: 613-270-4613
>
>
> Inactive hide details for "Christian W. Damus" ---03/11/2009 05:34:36
> PM---Hello, my PMC, As most of you already know, I have b"Christian W.
> Damus" ---03/11/2009 05:34:36 PM---Hello, my PMC, As most of you
> already know, I have been unemployed for some time
>
>
> From: 	
> "Christian W. Damus" <give.a.damus@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> To: 	
> PMC members mailing list <modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Cc: 	
> MDT OCL mailing list <mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eclipse Modelling
> Framework <emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Date: 	
> 03/11/2009 05:34 PM
>
> Subject: 	
> [emf-dev] Transition Plan for MDT OCL and EMF "QTV" Components?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hello, my PMC,
>
> As most of you already know, I have been unemployed for some time  
> now.  That interval is now coming to an end, to my great relief.
>
> However, in my new employment, the job description does not include  
> time to spend on development of the Eclipse Modeling components on  
> which I am currently a committer.  Nor would I expect it to, as the  
> work is quite removed from the MDD sphere.
>
> I would not be able to contribute as a committer on these components  
> to the standard expected of the Eclipse community, and certainly not  
> my own standard, on my own personal time.  Therefore, I shall need to  
> relinquish my committer rights on the MDT OCL component and the EMF  
> Query, Transaction, and Validation components as of next week.
>
> The problem is, of course, that I am the only committer on these  
> components.  As I understand the Eclipse process, a Project that finds  
> itself without any committers proceeds to Termination Review in the  
> hope that the project can be re-staffed.  Is the same true of  
> Components?  Can we assume that the rules of the new process (in which  
> these components that are still Components would be Projects) should  
> apply?
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Christian
> _______________________________________________
> emf-dev mailing list
> emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> emf-dev mailing list
> emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
>