[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [modeling-pmc] Galileo build status
|
Hi Rich,
I updated the emf-teneo.build file.
Can you include it in the build?
I hope that I didn't break anything...
gr. Martin
Richard Gronback wrote:
That’s right, thanks Paul.
I sent out a note to cross-project and I thought this list stating
that I’ll enter the reference within galileo.build myself in order to
prevent excessive breakage (not that that has worked all that well
either).
For the rest, just let me know when your build model is ready for
inclusion.
If you’re interested in seeing what’s currently included in Galileo,
look here: http://download.eclipse.org/releases/galileo
Best,
Rich
* From: * modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Paul Elder
*Sent:* Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:33 AM
*To:* PMC members mailing list
*Subject:* Re: [modeling-pmc] Galileo build status
Rich, and fellow Galileo build non-contributors:
With respect to JET, yes, I will continue updating the Galileo
contribution.
As for the others, my guess is that some misunderstanding on what is
required to be included in the Galileo build model. I clearly screwed
something up :-)
Information (which I just re-read) is available at:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Galileo/Build
I missed the part about adding a reference to my .build file to the
main galileo.build.
I imagine most components are using Nick's modeling build and thus
have (or can) easily generate component .build files. In that case, am
I correct in saying that all that remains is letting Rich know, and
he'll integrate it into galileo.build?
Paul
From:
"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
<modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
2009-01-08 09:01 AM
Subject:
[modeling-pmc] Galileo build status
Hi All,
With M4 Galileo builds underway, I notice not all Modeling components
that declared a desire to participate are included in the Galileo
build model. Specifically, I see the following issues:
XSD: is included, but you may want to change your template used to
generate mdt-xsd.build to have a better label than “EMF” ;)
JET: was included by me recently to allow STP to board the train. It’s
up-to-date for the JET M4 build and I expect Paul will be updating in
the future?
CDO & Net4j: recently updated the contact list, but is the content
ready for inclusion in galileo.build?
Teneo: untouched since my initial port from .sc to .build – is Teneo
not on the Galileo train? Or, can the current emf-teneo.build model be
included as-is? https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=253333#c4
Ecore Tools: same story, only the initial .build model exists. I don’t
see a breakdown of EMFT components to be included here, so can it be
created? https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=260196
Mint: on the train and ready to be included?
MWE: same question
Search: same question
Xpand: same question
Xtext: same question
And before you indicate your build model is ready to be included,
PLEASE verify your update site and model content is correct. All sites
should have p2 metadata repositories and your URL should not end in
/site.xml to allow p2 to bypass this anachronistic method.
Also, order is important in the Galileo model. Let me know what
prereqs you have so that when I add your contribution to the model it
builds properly.
Thanks,
Rich
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
modeling-pmc mailing list
modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
--
With Regards, Martin Taal
Springsite/Elver.org
Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
The Netherlands
Cell: +31 (0)6 288 48 943
Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
Mail: mtaal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - mtaal@xxxxxxxxx
Web: www.springsite.com - www.elver.org
