[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] RE: [mdt.dev] RE: Termination Review for MDT EODM
|
I don't think the Modeling project should invent our own policy/procedure
for terminated projects. The Foundation should treat all similarly and
redirect links to a common "Terminated Projects" page where related
artifacts can be found. I've mentioned this once already to the webmaster,
so I suggest we all do so again.
I don't have a problem with the "ether destination" for terminated projects.
If it was terminated for the right reasons, there should be nobody looking
for it. And what I don't want to promote is a sense that "code dumping" is
OK, and that if your project fails it just gets move to this little corner
of the website.
- Rich
On 10/1/08 12:36 AM, "Ian Bull" <irbull@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +1
>
> It was actually pretty funny, no sooner did I submit a research paper
> with a footnote pointing to the EODM project, did I get the e-mail about
> the termination review. :-)
>
> It would be nice if the URLs redirected to a page that said the project
> has been archived, the source is here and the final builds are there.
>
> Cheers,
> Ian
>
> Nick Boldt wrote:
>> So the download page will be updated to say "this project has been
>> archived, see archived builds below?"
>>
>> What about the update sites? Release notes? Search CVS commit data?
>>
>> Or should we create a new folder on the website, /modeling/archives/,
>> and put all the dead projects there? If so, any old links (home,
>> downloads, release notes) for EODM could bounce to that "project" and
>> its "components." This has precedent in that we've done many moves
>> from EMFT into EMF; this would be a similar "move."
>>
>> I've seen other projects get terminated and vanish into the ether; I'd
>> like to think we can do better than that in Modeling.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Kenn Hussey
>> <Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> Ian,
>>
>> The source code for the project will be archived in a ZIP file,
>> and I assume that builds will be moved to the build archive
>> server. If you're interested in taking a snapshot of the source,
>> now would be a good time. ;)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Kenn Hussey
>> Program Manager, Modeling and Design Solutions
>>
>> Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. | www.embarcadero.com
>> <http://www.embarcadero.com>
>> 82 Peter Street, Second Floor | Toronto, ON M5V 2G5
>> Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Mobile: 613-301-9105
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> [mailto:modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:modeling-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Ian Bull
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 6:48 PM
>> To: PMC members mailing list
>> Cc: Anne Jacko; MDT developers; EODM Dev list
>> Subject: Re: [modeling-pmc] RE: [mdt.dev] RE: Termination Review
>> for MDT EODM
>>
>> Kenn and Anne,
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, where does a project go when it dies? In
>> the case
>> of EODM, I actually use a small part of it. While I don't have the
>> expertise, time or interest in maintaining it, I was just wondering if
>> the current builds / source will still be available, or if I
>> should grab
>> the code before it disappears?
>>
>> cheers,
>> ian
>>
>> Kenn Hussey wrote:
>>>
>>> Anne,
>>>
>>> The slides for the MDT EODM termination review are attached.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *Kenn Hussey**
>>> **Program Manager, Modeling and Design Solutions*****
>>>
>>> *[Embarcadero Technologies Logo]* <http://www.embarcadero.com/>
>>>
>>> *Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. | **www.embarcadero.com
>> <http://www.embarcadero.com>*
>>> <http://www.embarcadero.com/>* **
>>> **82 Peter Street, Second Floor | Toronto, ON M5V 2G5**
>>> **Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*
>> <mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>> *Mobile: 613-301-9105*
>>>
>>> *From:* mdt.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:mdt.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> [mailto:mdt.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:mdt.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Kenn Hussey
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 28, 2008 9:24 PM
>>> *To:* Anne Jacko
>>> *Cc:* MDT developers; EODM Dev list; PMC members mailing list
>>> *Subject:* [mdt.dev] RE: Termination Review for MDT EODM
>>>
>>> Anne,
>>>
>>> We would like to schedule the review for October 8 instead. I'll get
>>> the slides to you by October 1.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>> *Kenn Hussey
>>> Program Manager, Modeling and Design Solutions*****
>>>
>>> *[Embarcadero Technologies Logo]* <http://www.embarcadero.com/>
>>>
>>> *Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. | **www.embarcadero.com
>> <http://www.embarcadero.com>*
>>> <http://www.embarcadero.com/>*
>>> **110 Spadina Avenue, Suite 400 | Toronto, ON M5V 2K4
>>> **Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*
>> <mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>> *Mobile: 613-301-9105*
>>>
>>> *From:* Anne Jacko [mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 28, 2008 5:30 PM
>>> *To:* Kenn Hussey
>>> *Cc:* PMC members mailing list; MDT developers; EODM Dev list;
>>> lzhangl@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:lzhangl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> *Subject:* Re: Termination Review for MDT EODM
>>>
>>> Hello Kenn (et al),
>>>
>>> Apologies for the delay in responding -- it's been busy. For a
>>> Termination Review, you need review docuware (slides), and PMC
>>> approval to have the review. We also suggest that you give the
>>> developers on the project notice that the review is being planned.
>>>
>>> Since you are a PMC member, and you have copied the dev list on this
>>> email, the only thing you still need to do is create a set of
>> slides.
>>> These are due at least one week before the scheduled review date.
>>>
>>> We are doing reviews on Wednesday, Sept. 17, at 8am PT. Will
>> that time
>>> work for you? Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Anne Jacko
>>>
>>> emo@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 21, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Kenn Hussey wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to request a Termination Review for the EODM
>> component of
>>> the MDT sub-project. There has been no activity in CVS by the
>>> committers on this component for a very long time (see
>>>
>>
>> http://dash.eclipse.org/dash/commits/web-app/active-committers.cgi?project=mo
>> deling.mdt)
>>>
>>
>> <http://dash.eclipse.org/dash/commits/web-app/active-committers.cgi?project=m
>> odeling.mdt%29>,
>>> and none of them has plans to further develop the component. We have
>>> identified parties interested in pursuing an implementation of the
>>> Ontology Definition Metamodel (ODM) at Eclipse, but we feel it would
>>> be best to do so as part of a new component with a new team of
>>> committers/contributors.
>>>
>>> Please advise as to how to proceed.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> *Kenn Hussey
>>> Program Manager, Modeling and Design Solutions*
>>>
>>> *<image001.jpg>* <http://www.embarcadero.com/>
>>>
>>> *Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. | **www.embarcadero.com
>> <http://www.embarcadero.com>*
>>> <http://www.embarcadero.com/>*
>>> 110 Spadina Avenue, Suite 400 | Toronto, ON M5V 2K4
>>> **Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*
>> <mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:Kenn.Hussey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>> *Mobile: 613-301-9105*
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner*
>> <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>>> believed to be clean.
>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> modeling-pmc mailing list
>>> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>>
>>
>> --
>> R. Ian Bull, PhD
>> University of Victoria
>> http://www.ianbull.com
>> http://irbull.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> modeling-pmc mailing list
>> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>> _______________________________________________
>> modeling-pmc mailing list
>> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> modeling-pmc mailing list
>> modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/modeling-pmc
>>
>