Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [modeling-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Lucas Bigeardel

Hi Ed--thanks. I've forwarded the stuff to Karl for his attention on Monday. Have a nice weekend!

Anne Jacko
Development Process Operations
Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:04 PM, Ed Merks wrote:


Thanks for the update. I'll wait patiently. The port is really helping to stream line the processes so it's worth it to iron out the wrinkles...

Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265  (t/l 313)

             Anne Jacko
             11/30/2007 02:54          Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
PM cc modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx, emf-dev <emf-dev>,
bjorn.freeman- benson@xxxxxxxxxxx,
                                       "Sharon Corbett"
                                       Re: [modeling-pmc] PMC approval
needed for committer vote for Lucas

Hi Ed et al,

Karl was working on this, and he's not back in the office until
Monday. I know that he was looking at EMFT records in the Portal and
database to try and get everything in order, but I'm not sure of the
current status of what he was doing. If we can wait until Monday when
Karl can take a look at this, that would be best. He has the best
visibility to what happens in the Portal.

Thanks for following the processes and being patient... the component
process is new and we found ourselves needing to change the system to
accommodate components earlier than we had planned for, which is why
it's been a bit rocky.

Anne Jacko
Development Process Operations
Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

On Nov 30, 2007, at 4:00 AM, Ed Merks wrote:


I hate to be a stickler for processes but if we don't follow them
it will just likely bite us latter.  I believe we have been
following the
processes carefully, including the excellent new improved process for
provisioning a new components, but despite that, the portal records
are a
little out of whack.    I opened this bugzilla a few days ago:

Unfortunately the only activity so far has been Sharon asking

   Hi Ed:  Regarding this bug?.I?m a bit confused about it.  Would
this be
   Modelling?s effort on the refactoring front or?

To which I replied:

   This is all simply trying to get the records to match all the
paper work
   we've filed for the last few months.  If you check your records
for each
   of these committers it will confirm that they were elected to
   these components.  You can also confirm that we sent
announcements for
   the creation the components themselves and you can confirm that
   exist is CVS by virtue of having followed the processes to
create them
   Somehow the records in the portal have failed to keep pace...

I'm trying the best I can to follow the processes and to keep the EMO
informed about discrepancies in the records the come from those
At this point, with the "invalid" vote just completed, I need some
as to how to proceed.  I.e., before I approve this vote, I want to be
absolutely clear that only the three ecoretools committers were
eligible to
vote and that the results of the election gives Lucas access to
only the
ecoretools component.  If necessary I can veto this result and we
can call
a new election but given that I'm not sure the portal records are
in place
so that David can nominate Lucas for the ecoretools component I'm
to do that; in fact, I'm pretty sure the records aren't fixed
because this
link still yields incomplete/incorrect results:

If I do veto the vote, I want to be sure the EMF/EMFT developers
the reason.  I'd certainly like this to proceed quickly.

Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
mailto: merks@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3265  (t/l 313)

----- Forwarded by Ed Merks/Toronto/IBM on 11/30/2007 06:42 AM -----

             (portal on behalf
emo)                                                    To
             Sent by:                  modeling-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
boun                                          cc

                                       [modeling-pmc] PMC approval
             11/30/2007 12:00          for committer vote for Lucas
             AM                        Bigeardel

             Please respond to
                PMC members
               mailing list

modeling PMC Members,
This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting
Lucas Bigeardel's Committer status on the modeling.emft project. As
member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My
portal page:

Lucas Bigeardel was nominated by David Sciamma as follows:
According to the last Modeling PMC meeting, I would like to
nominate Lucas
as a new Ecore Tools Committer (see
Lucas is the leader of EMF Search component and is offering to
an Ecore Search implementation to Ecore Tools component. To
maintain and
develop this contribution, Lucas need to be an Ecore Tools committer.
Please vote for this nomination.

Vote summary: 14/0/0 with 19 pending
  +1  Freddy Allilaire
   ?  Chris Aniszczyk
   ?  Lucas Bigeardel
   ?  Nick Boldt
   ?  Cédric  Brun
  +1  Sandro Böhme
  +1  Joel Cheuoua
  +1  Christopher Daly
   ?  Stephan Eberle
  +1  Sven Efftinge
   ?  Paul Elder
  +1  Peter Friese
   ?  Miguel Garcia
   ?  Laurent Goubet
   ?  Arno Haase
  +1  Bernd Kolb
  +1  Jacques Lescot
   ?  Ma Li
  +1  Ed Merks
  +1  Jonathan Musset
  +1  Peter Nehrer
   ?  Marcelo Paternostro
  +1  David Sciamma
   ?  Shaun Smith
   ?  Eike Stepper
   ?  Martin Taal
   ?  Thiago Tonelli Bartolomei
   ?  Antoine Toulme
  +1  Markus Voelter
   ?  Guo Tong Xie
   ?  Yang Yang
   ?  Pan Yue
  +1  gilles cannenterre

modeling-pmc mailing list

Back to the top