| Red Hat: -1
It’s too blanket of a statement/question. I am finding too many concessions within MicroProfile, like the namespace change. In support of Tomitribe’s past points on MicroProfile benefits, I also think there are a lot of cultural benefits within MicroProfile that would benefit Jakarta that we haven’t even gotten to (like transparency and open meetings). “We’ll figure it out after the move” means nothing will happen, IMHO.
I understand that there is a rush to get this done for Jakarta EE 12, but within MicroProfile I have a MIcroProfilehat on. On Jun 10, 2025, at 6:55 AM, Emily Jiang via microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you to the ones who have voted! Here is the summary. +1: Microsoft, IBM, Primeton, Payara, Fujitsu, Garden State JUG (non-binding). -1: Tomitribe, iJUG +0: Ostfalia (non-binding) Thanks, Emily
This is a non-binding straw poll vote-only thread, detailed below. Anyone can vote. The working group member reps will be counted separately for the corresponding ballot projection. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated. Please respond by June 4th, 2025.
"RESOLVED. The MicroProfile community would terminate the MicroProfile working group."
-- _______________________________________________microprofile-wg mailing listmicroprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg
|
