Michael,
Thanks for your feedback! This straw poll is trying to say:
Move the MicroProfile specifications as they were and the namespace discussion can happen after the move and be decided by the comitters of the corresponding MicroProfile specification.
Question: what namespace should be used for the moved MicroProfile Fault Tolerance.
Answer: it will be decided by the committers in MicroProfile Fault Tolerance. If the committers decide to keep the existing org.eclipse.microprofile.fault.tolerance, it is fine. However, if they want to change to jakarta.microprofile.fault.tolerance, it is fine too.
By the way, I need a bit more clarification regarding free-for-all. I don't understand your question either. Can you explain in more detail?
Thanks,
Emily
-1 from the Garden State JUG.
Based on our interpretation of this straw poll, it sounds like there is the potential for a "free-for-all" in a naming convention. Will the standard root namespace be required as it should? This was not made clear, so we stand by our -1 with the way this has been written.
This is a non-binding straw poll vote-only thread, detailed below.
Anyone can vote. The working group member reps will be counted
separately for the corresponding ballot projection. Please respond with
+1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any
feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.
Please respond by June 4th, 2025.
--
_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg
--
Code, Test, Write, Cycle, Run, Drink, Sleep ... Repeat
Java Champion
Lead Java Queue Editor, InfoQ
Contract Developer Advocate, Payara
Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouler
--