[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT][Creation Review] MicroProfile JWT Bridge Specification - Voting ends on August 8th
|
+1 (iJUG)
Comments:
Before the creation review, we
discussed the right name this spec and agreed to define the scope
of it, before we rediscuss the proper naming. With the defined
scope here, we do integration testing (it's not called "bridge
testing") and I think we might need a follow up on the naming to
make it intuitive to people, that have not being part of the last
meetings.
Historical reasons where put into to the ring, but the future "CDI
Integration spec" is pointing to another direction. Unfortunately
there was no time to finish this discussion and of course nobody
would liked to block MP JWTs progress (dropping dependencies and
tests).
Another point is misleading for me too:
Jakarta Web Profile is a superset of Jakarta Core Profile, as
Jakarta Platform is it of Jakarta Web Profile (with the next
release at true one).
Why should a Jakarta Web Profile implementation should not have to
pass as Jakarta Core Profile (and Jakarta Platform implementation
Web and Core Profile)? This makes no sense to me, especially when
the Platform TCK is separated out to the component specs
completely (as planed for Jakarta EE 11).
And did we discussed recently not depend component specs on
umbrella specs at all and let them depend on component specs only?
So this would mean to scope the sets of integration tests on
security related component specs of these profiles or the complete
Platform.
But all this might be further discussed
when the spec is created - the naming could be changed, as there
is no separate EF Project for it and trademarking (if any) could
be done later if this comment is added. BTW; my preferred name for
this would be "MicroProfile JWT Integration" with this scope now.
Best,
Jan
Am 01.08.23 um 23:51 schrieb Emily
Jiang via microprofile-wg:
To approve
and ratify the Creation Review of the MicroProfile JWT
Bridge Specification,
a Steering Committee Representative's vote is requested.
Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1
(reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support
your vote will be appreciated.
The full
details for the Creation Plan is here.
The
MicroProfile Specification Process requires the
Specification Committee and the Community to provide
feedback during the approval process using the relevant
documents:
https://github.com/microprofile/microprofile-wg/pull/194
This
ballot runs for seven days, so it ends on August 8th,
2023. The ballot requires a Super-majority positive vote
of the Steering Committee members. There is no veto.
Community input and Community votes are welcomed.
However, only the votes delivered by Steering Committee
Representatives will be counted.
--
Thank you
Emily Jiang
on behalf of
MicroProfile Steering Committee
_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg
