Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT][MicroProfile 6.0] Specification - Release Review - VOTE by Dec 6th (2 weeks)
0 (iJUG)

Why:
As mentioned in the plan review already, I think the current way to build the MP platform release creates potential issues, as only the MP platform CI tests the included component specs with the Jakarta 10 Core Profile base line - as mentioned here we should think about releasing multiple versions with different Jakarta EE base versions and requirements in the future: https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile/issues/295
With this release, this is only partly solved with the major release of MP Metrics and new addition of MP Telemetry, the rest of the specs adds support for it only without trying to break anything and somehow running the tests hopefully with the new baseline too. Instead this could (and should) be ensured with two separate artifacts representing the different base lines defining the environment of use in the future.


Additional small findings in spec document:

- Typo in architecture section: OpenTelemetry is written without space in between.
- Outdated MP Fault Tolerance statement in it's section: "Fault Tolerance 3.0 is now dependent on Jakarta EE 8 technologies." -> should be deleted.
- Typo in MP Telemetry section: the 2nd telemetry should start with a lower case - but we may find a better description in this section at all in the future.

I will create an issue for these soon.

As mentioned in the MP Metrics ballot already, I think MP Metrics is a valid part of the platform for now, as OpenTelemtry Metrics is not in an equivalent state and it could be based on it - so dropping it now would be not an option and the request for making it optional came very late and external TCK dependencies to it could not be solved in time.
My vote so goes in the opposite direction as Red Hat's and Tomitribe's cause here.
But both reasons could be addressed in a future release hopefully.

Thanks,
Jan


Am 22.11.22 um 22:03 schrieb Emily Jiang via microprofile-wg:
To approve and ratify the Release Review of MicroProfile 6.0, the Steering Committee Representatives vote is requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject).  Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

The MicroProfile Specification Process requires the Specification Committee and the Community to provide feedback during the approval process using the relevant documents:


This ballot will be fourteen days, ending on Tuesday, December 6th.  However, it will be great if you can vote before December 2nd. The ballot requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Steering Committee members.  There is no veto. Community input and Community votes are welcomed. However, only the votes delivered by Steering Committee Representatives will be counted.

--

Thank you

Emily Jiang on behalf of the MicroProfile Steering Committee


_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg


Back to the top