| Hi,
Sorry I was on PTO and missed the ballot.
-1 (Red Hat)
Red Hat's position statement on Metrics was previously communicated here:
Cheers, Roberto
I declare this ballot complete and approved. The summary of the votes is below. Representative | Representative for: | Vote | Summers Pittman, Vincent Mayers | Atlanta JUG | +1 | Kenji Kazumura, Takahiro Nagao | Fujitsu | +1 | Chandra Guntur, Michael Redlich | Garden State Java User Group | +1 | Emily Jiang, Nathan Rauh | IBM | +1 | Jan Westerkamp, Heiko Rupp | iJUG | +1 | Edward Burns | Microsoft | +1 | Ed Bratt, Dmitry Kornilov | Oracle | +1 | John Clingan, Roberto Cortez | Red Hat | No Vote | David Blevins, Amelia Eiras | Tomitribe | +1 | | Total | 8 |
Thanks everyone for voting! Microsoft votes +1. From: microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg-bounces@ eclipse. org> On Behalf Of David Blevins Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 2: 11 PM To: Microprofile WG discussions <microprofile-wg@ eclipse. org> This Message Is From an External Sender | This message came from outside your organization. |
|
|
Microsoft votes +1. +1 (Tomitribe)
To approve and ratify the Plan Review of the MicroProfile Metrics 5.0 Specification, a Steering Committee Representatives vote is requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated. The MicroProfile Specification Process requires the Specification Committee and the Community to provide feedback during the approval process using the relevant documents: This ballot runs for seven days, so it ends on August 24th, 2022. The ballot requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Steering Committee members. There is no veto. Community input and Community votes are welcomed. However, only the votes delivered by Steering Committee Representatives will be counted. Nathan Rauh on behalf of MicroProfile Steering Committee I'm sending this as the alternate steering committee member to Emily Jiang while she is out of the office. If this isn't within the scope of what a backup member can do, then could another working group member please re-send it?
|
