Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT] MicroProfile TCK Process

Thank you Kenji for your suggestion on the layout. I have addressed your comments here. Please comment on the PR to see whether the update is sufficient.

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 1:00 PM kzr@xxxxxxxxxxx <kzr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+1 with requirements of  minor fixes (Fujitsu)



The indentation level of “A top-level README document outlining” is need one more.

It seems that “anchor:” tag is not valid in ascii doc.


-Kenji Kazumura



From: microprofile-wg <microprofile-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Emily Jiang via microprofile-wg
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2022 8:10 AM
To: Microprofile WG discussions <microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [microprofile-wg] [BALLOT] MicroProfile TCK Process


As agreed on yesterday's MicroProfile Technical call, I have now merged the PR of MicroProfile TCK Process from David and myself. The TCK process can be viewed from here.


To approve and ratify the MicroProfile TCK Process, the Steering Committee Representatives' vote is requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

According to MicroProfile Specification Process, This ballot runs for seven days and ends on February 16th. The ballot requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Steering Committee members. There is no veto. Community input and Community votes are welcomed. However, only the votes delivered by Steering Committee Representatives will be counted.


Emily Jiang on behalf of MicroProfile Steering Committee

microprofile-wg mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit


Back to the top