[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [microprofile-wg] [External] : [BALLOT] Replace MicroProfile Compatibility Logo with compatible implementations web page. VOTE by Friday, November 12th
|
-1 (Oracle)
Oracle believes that a compatibility and branding program should
be part of the specification working group program. We believe
that this helps build the strength of the brand and provides
customers assurance that compatibility and the brand go together.
We would prefer that effort be devoted by this working group to
build a brand that could be strong enough that vendors will have
sufficient incentive to apply for and utilize the brand marks. We
also believe the current program helps build the strength and
diversity of the working group through vendor participation
requirements and incentives.
-- Ed Bratt
On 11/5/2021 11:59 AM, John Clingan
wrote:
Background
discussion is available here and
here. Compatible implementations will be required to
pass the TCK. This ballot applies to all MicroProfile
specifications.
RESOLVED, the Steering Committee confirms that the MicroProfile
working group will operate without a MicroProfile compatibility
program and will not develop and utilize a Compatibility logo
for use by compatible implementations of MicroProfile, and
instead will allow any implementation that can make bonafide
claims of compatibility in accordance with the Eclipse
Foundation Specification Process to be listed and linked to as a
compatible implementation on its webpage.
_______________________________________________
microprofile-wg mailing list
microprofile-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/microprofile-wg__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!YLIySycBt-WF-Lo3u1lz2IUx4ZA5q_5sN44fqLvmTm8X0zGABIijLeNwAC0laj4$