Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [microprofile-wg] [microprofile] Re: Requirements for compatibility logo usage

This isn’t really a compromise from Red Hat's (and Tomitribe’s) stated position. It’s the same state as before, really. Red Hat maintains its desire for simple, community-centric compatibility approach requiring successfully passing TCKs.

On Nov 3, 2021, at 4:52 PM, Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


That is exactly how Jakarta EE works today, and is the essence of the original proposal.

On 2021-11-03 7:34 p.m., Emily Jiang via microprofile-wg wrote:
At the moment, we are discussing logo vs. no logo. Is it possible to compromise the two options?
We can have a compatibility logo but for WG members only. However, non WG members are allowed to claim compatibility without the legal right of using the compatibility logo. Being a member and non-member, the only difference is the logo access.

Mike Milinkovich
Executive Director | Eclipse Foundation AISBL

Avast logo

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

microprofile-wg mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top