Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [microprofile-wg] [microprofile] Re: Requirements for compatibility logo usage

Thank you Mike for your quick response! I think the compatibility logo is a big icon for being a standard body.

Since any non-wg members can still claim compatibility, the logo is just one more sticker for the WG members. We can define a webpage to list all of the compatible implementations. Any implementations within WG can use the logo in their marketing slides. Why should we as a WG destroy the full effort of having a compatibility logo? 


On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:53 PM Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


That is exactly how Jakarta EE works today, and is the essence of the original proposal.

On 2021-11-03 7:34 p.m., Emily Jiang via microprofile-wg wrote:
At the moment, we are discussing logo vs. no logo. Is it possible to compromise the two options?
We can have a compatibility logo but for WG members only. However, non WG members are allowed to claim compatibility without the legal right of using the compatibility logo. Being a member and non-member, the only difference is the logo access.


Mike Milinkovich

Executive Director | Eclipse Foundation AISBL


Avast logo

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

microprofile-wg mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit


Back to the top