Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[microprofile-wg] [BALLOT] [COMPLETE] Ballot results for the June 8th Steering Committee Minutes Approval

I declare this ballot complete and approved. 

Corporate/Community Member
Atlanta JUG
Community (Edwin Derks)

Garden State JUG

Red Hat


Non-binding Votes


On Jul 1, 2021, at 11:19 AM, John Clingan <jclingan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Meeting minutes pasted below. Meeting minutes PDF attached. Source minutes available here.


MicroProfile Steering Committee Meeting - June 8th, 2021

  1. DO NOT EDIT AGENDA. This is the responsibility of the meeting moderator with input from the steering committee and community. Agenda items should be discussed in the mailing list/forum or in prior Steering Committee meetings first.
  2. Prefer comments occur in mailing lists/forums.
  3. Document editing is enabled for community to add themselves to list of community contributors during call

Tweeted pic here, recording here, meeting minutes folder here

Meeting Attendees
Steering Committee
(Quorum = 6)
(Name, organization)
Atlanta JUG - Summers Pittman, Vincent Mayers
Fujitsu - Kenji Kazamura
IBM - Kevin Sutter, Emily Jiang
iJUG - Jan Westerkamp
Jelastic - Ruslan Synytsky, Tetiana Fydorenchyk
Garden State JUG - Chandra Guntur, Michael Redlich, Barry Burd
Oracle - Ed Bratt, Dmitry Kornilov
Payara - Rudy De Busscher
Red Hat - John Clingan, Roberto Cortez
Tomitribe - David Blevins, Amelia Eiras
Committer Member: Edwin Derks

Eclipse Foundation
Paul Buck 
Sharon Corbett
Paul White
Ivar Grimstad
Tanja Obradovic

  • Martin Stefanko (Red Hat)
  • Scott Stark (Red Hat)
  • Neha Sardana (GSJUG)
  • Emerson Castaneda

Agenda Item
Past meeting minutes approval
Business since last Steering Committee Meeting

Current Items
Patent Implementation Ballot started
FYI only, no planned discussion. Link to vote thread

MicroProfile 2021 Budget Discussion

Eclipse Foundation will deliver a budget presentation. Budget Governance, the first half of the presentation was recorded. Sharon, EMO, asked for the 2nd portion of the presentation, Budget discussion & approval not to be recorded. 

Additional material:

Question on existing vendor relationships came up and how it relates to EMO managing vendor relationships. EF has vendor relationships and MicroProfile members have vendor relationships. If established relationships are cost effective, the intent is to continue using those vendors. The desire is for those MP vendors to work with the EF directly. 

For money already spent on program plan items, the EF will work with MP SC to reimburse SC members that funded the 2021 program plan items. Future reimbursements, to Members executing the work, are possible if within the budget and approved by the WG.  

Question was brought up on ~$1K difference between EF marketing budget and MicroProfile Marketing assumed budget. Agreed to take offline or discuss after presentation.

Question on $40K cost of compatibility program. Will be covered in more detail on Monday’s Marketing call. The $40K will be adjusted based on the work done by the MicroProfile community.

Question on using Google AdWords for marketing. Briefly covered that the Marketing team came up with the budgeted amount.

Agreed to “collaborate/discuss” the $40K trademark allocated spend when the time comes.

Platform spec defines compatibility rules. If certification applies to individual/component specs, then additional trademark work needs to be done.

Clarification of ongoing vs one-time costs needs to be stated within the budget.  Plan for a budget-ready resolution next Tuesday.

Next Steering Committee call
Parking Lot

Compatibility Certification Request Format

<MicroProfile Steering Committee Meeting - June 8th 2021.pdf>

Back to the top