|Re: [microprofile-wg] [External] : Proposal to standardise the process for creating new proposals|
How planning review process is tracked? Do we have a repository similar to Jakarta ‘specifications’ repository? I see that planning review with all required information (including goals) should be submitted and tracked there. In this case we don’t need sandbox because goals and other information is a part of planning review submission.
Today is a public holiday in Prague. Unfortunately, I won’t be able to join today’s MP meeting.
Thank you Dmitry for the feedback! By the way, the sandbox does not require APIs to be present. It can just contain the readme to flush out the goals and use cases the proposal is to address. I think using sandbox drafts out the proposal so that others can participate early might be something beneficial and transparent. After some socialisation on the sandbox proposal, the proposal can be used to create plan review, which might have a better chance to go through the ballot. We can discuss this further in today's meeting.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 4:02 PM Dmitry Kornilov <dmitry.kornilov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Back to the top