| Re: [mdt-papyrus.dev] Feedbacks about architecture framework |
|
Hi all, In addition to previous feedback I’d like the architecture model editor to have: ·
tooltips on fields that explain what the fields is needed to ·
when the field is a reference (example : elementtype set) : to have a reference editor that allows reference to workspace resources regards, Xavier De : mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
De la part de LORENZO Vincent Hi Patrick,
Développing the matrix framework, I fill these 2 bugs on AF :
516586: [AFViewpoints][Matrix] Architecture Framework should provide more informations https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=516586 517986: [SysML 1.1][SysML 1.4][UML][AFViewpoints] declared architecture model should use a common pattern for naming https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=517986
The last one is maybe fixed now. Regards, -- Vincent Lorenzo De : mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
De la part de TESSIER Patrick Hi all committers and advanced users of papyrus, For the oxygen version, the architecture framework has been developed and used. I would like to know your feedbacks about this framework, to include , if needed, improvements in the road map of photon. You can write that it is nice, why, we appreciate this kind of remarks. You can also write remarks about:
-
Needs improvements about developer points of view:
o
Configuration about .architecture
o
How to define something that you have difficulties to do.
o
Maybe problems of performance that you have detected.
-
Needs improvements about user points of view:
o
Menus
o
Some behaviors that you have not understand… Responses need to be clearly and precise in order to be managed. Patrick Tessier |